Board Certification After Awhile

Was it worth it? I know many wonder this same question, and I believe it is. It is expensive to keep current. There is a yearly fee due to BPS every year. The required approved continuing education is pricey and complicated. 

The reason I continue to believe it is worth it is because prior to obtaining this, I feel like I had something to prove. Many newer grads felt or assumed I was a BS Pharm even though I was a PharmD. Many assume that because I have been out of school over 15 years, I am behind the times. Experience is sometimes not as valued in every job culture no matter what field it is. Bright and eager new graduates come out feeling as though we are behind the times, and sometimes they are right. 

Prior to obtaining my BCPS, I had no residency to point to. Yes, we had residencies back then, but my debt load didn't endorse another year of the same at half the price. The return on investment didn't seem good enough. If I was graduating today, I would definitely do a residency. 

What happened to me after the board certification is that I quit trying to prove myself to peers. I refocused my efforts on the patients by doing a better job in going the extra mile and also by noticing the system issues that aren't being exposed. I also have stopped trying to make my career the thing I work on the most and have let it fall to a healthier place behind God and family. What will be will be.  

Should a job in pharmacy open up where I can do more of the things I enjoy: clinical decision making, brainstorming, patient advocacy, and writing, I will be moved. Until then I credit certification to validating competiveness with newer pharmacists while also solidifying my belief that experience is king. I am glad I invested in myself and hope you will too! 

Alert Fatigue; Pop-up Fatigue and Drug Errors

image.jpg

It would be nearly impossible for me to meet the standard rate (number of entries per hour) of many hospital companies and properly investigate every single issue with a particular medication against disease state, interactions with other meds and allergies. We rely heavily on computer programs and screening programs to help facilitate this job. However, with the invention of alerts while we work is the issue of "alert fatigue."

The biggest problem I have encountered over the past several years is the sensitivity of alerts. I frequently not only get alerts for the things I NEED to know but the things that are not nearly as important. I receive an alert daily for Sodium Chloride 0.9% IV fluid and Potassium Chloride when entering the two.  The interaction is "chloride." Keep in mind, the potassium chloride is actually compounded into sodium chloride. This is mixed in with more important alerts like what the patient's potassium level really is. I also receive alerts about what is formulary and non formulary, what is in stock, what is on backorder, if I need to add an NDC to something for billing, if I need to pick another strength, if the med can only be ordered by one doctor and not another, and so on. This is all mixed in with the same level of importance as creatinine with metformin, INRs for warfarin, allergies entered, height and weight of the patient, and so on. With at least ten alerts per order and around fifty orders per hour, we are nearing 500 alerts per hour all the while answering phone calls, questions from the staff and people just walking into the room to chat and say hi. It's no wonder I feel so distracted.

The problem with this methodology is that we lose the real alerts that are important. Comparing an alert for someone with hyperkalemia with ordering potassium replacement vs letting me know that I need to change the potassium to another NDC vs that the med is on back-order is really changing the way the system was intended. Also, is anyone monitoring all the alerts that are bypassed daily? Is anyone noticing these and monitoring trends? 

Too many alerts turn into noise.

I know that if all facilities would start an initiative to reduce alerts, alerts would have more meaning and pharmacists would probably react more to the alert. 

And maybe... less errors. 

With the implementation of CPOE, this issue has risen to the forefront of what prescribers must wade through in selecting the best medication therapy for their patients. While the industry worries about prescribers becoming complacent to alerts due to overly sensitive drug-drug interactions or drug-allergy interactions, pharmacists have been battling this for years. Prescribers seemingly must worry about the meds and patients whilst pharmacists are wading through the leftover messages with safety along with pharmacoeconomic issues.

1. Alerts should be tiered. Level 1, 2, 3, etc or color coded based on severity.  Never allow one sweeping override reason count for multiple alerts.

2. Alerts that have nothing to do with patient safety, formulary comments, billing issues should be reserved at another level not mixed in with potentially life-saving messages!

Adding financial notes with the already overburdened system of patient safety is a recipe for disaster both in patient safety and also for pharmacist job satisfaction. 

ISMP mentions this: "Protect against ALERT FATIGUE through fewer, more appropriate alerts that need consideration by pharmacists before filling the prescriptions.

Optimize the sensitivity of alert systems by carefully selecting alert severity levels and allowing only the most significant alerts to appear on the screen during data entry." 

3. Hard stops should be built for certain high risk interactions (even if the money doesn't exist to build). 

4. Someone in the department should be trending overrides. What are the trends? Can the system be improved without waiting for an event that causes injury?

5. Allow pharmacists who use the system daily to report alerts that are not needed.  

"Encourage the reporting of invalid or insignificant warnings so they can be altered or removed from the computer system." -ISMP

This is a great article on alert fatigue from our perspective. 

 

 

AAFP Says No to Safe Use Class of Drugs

AAFP Says No to 'Safe Use' Class of DrugsBy Emily P. Walker, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today Published: May 01, 2012

WASHINGTON -- The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) has voiced its opposition to an FDA proposal that would allow pharmacists to dispense some drugs without a prescription.

Currently, the FDA approves drugs either as prescription or nonprescription, but the agency is considering adding a third class of drugs called "safe use" drugs, which would be regulated much as over-the-counter drugs are now, but with extra controls.

"The AAFP recognizes the important role of pharmacists in the provision of high quality healthcare; however, this proposed new paradigm would allow patients to receive powerful prescription drugs without the input of a physician," Roland Goertz, MD, chairman of AAFP board, wrote in an April 30 letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg.

In a notice published in February, the FDA said it is considering a "new paradigm" where drugs that would normally require a prescription could be available without one if they met certain "conditions of safe use."

Those conditions could include restricting them to sale behind the counter at a pharmacy, or requiring an initial prescription but allowing refills at the patient's request.

Examples cited by Janet Woodcock, head of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, might be EpiPens or glucagon -- both of which are prescribed for possibly life-threatening conditions and which patients can easily find themselves without when they're needed.

Moving some prescription drugs into safe use status could allow patients to skip visits to the doctor, which the AAFP opposes.

"Only licensed doctors of medicine, osteopathy, dentistry, and podiatry have the statutory authority to prescribe drugs ... . Allowing the pharmacist authority to dispense medication without consulting with the patient's physician first could seriously compromise the physician's ability to coordinate the care of multiple problems of many patients," Goertz wrote in the letter to Hamburg.

In March, the FDA held a public meeting on its proposed plan and heard from stakeholders such as the AAFP, the AMA, which is also opposed to the safe use category, and the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), which is in favor of adding this third category of drugs.

Thomas Menighan, CEO of the APhA, said creating a safe use category could greatly improve access to drugs because pharmacists are the most easily accessed healthcare provider for many patients.

In addition to improving access for patients, reducing routine doctor's visits could free up physicians to spend more time with sicker patients, "reduce the burdens on the already overburdened healthcare system, and reduce healthcare costs," the February FDA notice read.

When nicotine replacement therapy changed from requiring a prescription to being over-the-counter, tens of thousands of people quit smoking, which represented a $2 billion annual "societal benefit," Scott Melville, CEO of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, a trade group for over-the-counter drugmakers, said during the FDA's public meeting.

In addition, making heartburn medicines available without a prescription saves the healthcare system $757 million each year, according to Melville.

In order for the FDA to consider switching a drug from prescription to nonprescription, it must meet certain criteria, including that it must not be addictive; it must not have significant toxicity if overdosed; and users must be able to self-diagnose conditions for appropriate use and be able to safely take the medication without a physician's screening.

Presumably some of those same requirements would apply to drugs moved from prescription status to the new safe use status.

During the March public meeting, an ob/gyn argued that birth control pills -- especially progestin-only pills -- meet those criteria and should be available without a prescription.

The FDA is seeking comments on the proposal.

--

My take? We have more drug training than physicians. It's all about the $.

The Top 10 iPad Apps for Pharmacists

Want to know the top 10 apps I use in pharmacy practice?

1. MedCalc Pro - is a medical calculator that gives you easy access to complicated medical formulas, scores, scales and classifications.MedCalc has been available on mobile platforms for more than a decade, so it leverages years of experience in bringing medical equations to physicians in an easy to use, yet very powerful format. The Pro version offers premium features such as native iPad support, a patient database to store results and many ways to export results (email, airprint, copy to clipboard). If you're on a tight budget, you can always check out the cheaper but still amazing MedCalc.

2. Sanford Guide - The Sanford Guide is the essential resource for healthcare professionals who care for patients with infectious diseases. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2011 application provides fast, convenient access to critical information on treatment of infectious diseases, for timely, effective decisions at the point of care. Always a pocket guide, still a pocket guide. Portability has been a hallmark of The Sanford Guide for over 40 years. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2011 application extends that portability to iOS4 devices: iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad. The most trusted infectious diseases treatment resource in print now presents the same comprehensive, treatment- focused coverage of infectious diseases and clinical conditions, anti-infective drug information, therapeutic adjuncts and comparative spectra of activity in a clean, uncluttered, device-optimized interface. Based on the Sanford Guide Web Edition, the application features expanded coverage of topics compared to the print edition.

3. Medscape - The #1 free medical app in iTunes containing drug reference, daily medical news, CME/CE, drug interaction checker, disease and condition reference, procedure and protocols, and other special features. A must!

4. MedPage - MedPage Today is the only service for physicians that provides a clinical perspective on the breaking medical news that their patients are reading. Co-developed by MedPage Today and The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Office of Continuing Medical Education, each article alerts clinicians to breaking medical news, with summaries and actionable information enabling them to better understand the implications.

5. WebMD - WebMD helps you with your decision-making and health improvement efforts by providing mobile access 24/7 to mobile-optimized health information and decision-support tools including WebMD’s Symptom Checker, Drugs & Treatments, First Aid Information and Local Health Listings. WebMD also gives you access to first aid information without having to be connected wirelessly – critical if you don’t have Internet access in the time of need. Personalize your app by saving drugs, conditions and articles relevant to you — through secure access and easy sign-in.

6. Epocrates - Get quick access to reliable drug, disease, and diagnostic information at the point of care. Epocrates is the #1 mobile drug reference among U.S. physicians. Trusted for accurate content and innovative offerings, 50% of U.S. physicians rely on Epocrates to help improve patient safety and increase practice efficiency.

7. Lexicomp - Committed to improving medication safety with innovative products and technology designed for healthcare professionals, Lexicomp offers a variety of drug information and medical applications for iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. These applications are tailored to meet the point-of-care needs of pharmacists, physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners and dentists by storing content directly on the mobile device. Access to Lexicomp's up-to-date drug information and clinical content is a must for the busy healthcare professional who desires the necessary tools to make important medication and clinical decisions from the palm of their hand! Download your Lexicomp mobile drug information application on the app store.

8. Redi-Reader – the reader I use to read articles, studies, etc…

9. Pharmacy Times – Keeping up with pharmacy news. I choose this app.

10. PACID - Last, but certainly not least, ID Compendium, A Persiflager's Guide by Mark Crislip, MD and programming by Walter Crittenden, PharmD (shout out to the PharmD!). This app is sweet for infectious disease!

p.s. I saved the best for last ;)

Arizona Academy of Family Physicians

Laura Hahn, the director of the Arizona Academy of Family Physicians is spearheading the argument against the Arizona Pharmacy Alliance's attempt to allow pharmacies to dispense vaccinations without the need of a prescription.  Unbelievably, the pharmacists won the first round.  Both sides are using public health as their argument.  The pharmacists are arguing that the rates of the public health actually getting the flu vaccine (among others) are lower than the CDC recommends due to the lack of health insurance.  Doctors are arguing that pharmacists would be putting people at risk. It's quite ironic to me that the very people preaching about vaccinations and compliance are the ones who just want to make an extra dollar.  It's not about public health.  One point:

Hahn said her doctors have no problem with pharmacists administering routine flu or pneumonia vaccines without a prescription.

“But certain vaccines, for the safety of the public, need to be given in a medical (or) home situation,” she said.

Some of that, she said, is because a doctor would be more familiar with a patient’s family history and the possibility of allergic reactions. And some of it, Hahn said, is that giving a vaccine involves more than just injecting it.

She specifically mentioned the HPV vaccine being marketed to teen girls designed to prevent a type of virus transmitted by sexual contact. Hahn said a doctor who might prescribe this would tell a patient that the vaccine prevents neither pregnancy nor other sexually transmitted diseases, “not things that would be discussed (with a patient) by a pharmacist.”

“Patient safety has to come first,” Hahn said.

Patient safety has to come first?  You are telling me that it is assumed a pharmacist cannot tell a patient that the HPV virus won't protect them from STDs?

What is coming first here is the Almighty Dollar yet again.  Doctors don't want to lose more money to pharmacists.

And YES.  We did take years of pharmacology vs. a semester by most physicians.  Do we claim that the patients' health is at risk because a doctor accidentally gives two drugs that interact with one another together because he/she didn't know?

Article here.

Why Does it Take So Long to Fill My Prescription?

The age old question that used to make my toes curl...  why does it take so long to fill my prescription?  If you search around the net, you'll find non medical people discussing, and it's hilarious: Why does it take so long to refill my prescription?  I went there yesterday and it took them 2 hours to refill my medicine.  I wanted to call the manager to complain but thought I'd ask here first.

Yahoo's best answer voted (not kidding):  If they did it in 2 minutes, you wouldn't value them as much. You'd think that they were just technicians putting pills in a bottle.

They have to make you wait to preserve the mystique.

Yeah, that's it baby.  We need more value?  We love mystique.

Basically the bottom line is that there are hundreds ahead of you!